Defiende que Lex Irnitana 98 contiene una epistula Domitiani frente al sector doctrinal que considera que constituye un rescripto. Así mismo, establece una conexión entre el fragmento irnitano y Urs. 133. Sostiene que ambas fuentes son probablemente de la misma época y convalidan matrimonios defectuosos celebrados en el municipio de Irni y en la colonia Genetiva Iulia, respectivamente.
It defends that Lex Irnitana 98 contains an epistula Domitiani in opposition to the Doctrinal Sector which considers it to be a rescript. Likewise, it establishes a connection between the irnitanian fragment and Urs. 133. It maintains that both sources probably belong to the same period of time and validate defective marriages celebrated in both the municipality of Irni and the colonia Genetiva Iulia.